How accurate is radiocarbon dating Wep chat xxx american

Frederick Johnson explained how: "With few exceptions, this [archaeological] extraction was by inference and guessing... Johnson then cited on the same page a typical comment of one very reputable archaeologist, "We stand before the threat of the atom in the form of radiocarbon dating.

Libby's provision of a means of counting time one that promised a definable degree of accuracy and worldwide consistency caused all sorts of consternation because many of the new findings threw doubt on the validity of some established archaeological opinions" (Frederick Johnson, "Radiocarbon Dating and Archaeology in North America," Science, Vol. This may be the last chance for old-fashioned, UNCONTROLLED GUESSING." Archaeology Versus Chemistry Even after radiocarbon dating became established, disagreements were widespread.

Consider one example that of a hunting people, called Solutreans, in Europe. Peake and Fleure think it was about 12,000 years ago, while Zeuner puts them back to 67,000 years before our time. Archaeologists had no way to accurately count actual years.

Radiocarbon dates indicate only 18,000 years." (Kenneth Macgowan and Joseph Hester, Early Man in the New World, New York: Natural History Library Edition, 1962, p. Consequently, no way initially existed to check the dates radiocarbon gave in the prehistoric period. Libby and his associates were faced with this problem when they first devised the radiocarbon method. Libby, writing in the January, 1956 issue of the American Scientist recounted briefly the history of radiocarbon dating: "The first shock Dr.

Libby, "Radiocarbon Dating," American Scientist, Vol. This factor alone would have a great bearing on the radiocarbon method of dating.

Suppose these and/or other factors had disturbed the critical relationship of radioactive carbon-14 to ordinary carbon-12?

In spite of the attractiveness of radiocarbon dating, these and other basic unanswered problems plague the researchers.

"You read in books and find statements that such and such a society or archaeological site is 20,000 years old. What About "Historical" Dates Egyptian history begins around 5,000 years ago, according to the most liberal estimates.

"We learned rather abruptly that these numbers, these ancient ages, are not known; in fact, it is at about the time of the first dynasty of Egypt that the last historical date of any real certainty has been established. Some historians believe that Egyptian history does not extend that far into the past.

However, the atmospheric radiocarbon concentration depends on the production rate of radiocarbon by cosmic rays in the stratosphere and the carbon cycle on the earth, and there is NO EVIDENCE that either was constant in the past" (Kunihiko Kigoshi and Hiroichi Hasegawa, "Secular Variation of Atmospheric Radiocarbon Concentration and Its Dependence on Geomagnetism," Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. Suppose some shielding effect negated the cosmic shower's production of radiocarbon?

Please or register to post comments
If spammers comment on your content, only you can see and manage such comments Delete all

How accurate is radiocarbon dating introduction

How accurate is radiocarbon dating

Recent posts

02-Jul-2018 23:00
03-Jul-2018 04:36